Archive for May, 2010

24
May
10

GenMed Show “The Hills Have (i)’s”

In this episode Natalie, Myself and special guest Scott Kier (@medicsbk) discuss our recent trip to NAEMT’s inaugural event: EMS on the Hill in Washington DC. They talk about the policies being pushed by EMS leaders and field medics alike and why they are relevant to all in the healthcare industry. —–>Listen Now

24
May
10

GenMed Show “Deal Or No Deal”

In this episode we talk about workplace stress, how people cope, and what happens when coping doesn’t work.

An interesting topic with good discussion.  To listen to the show, click here

15
May
10

Hatzalah. A unique model of community/volunteer Paramedicine

For some time now, the idea of a “Community Paramedic” has popped up in many discussions on how to better serve our patients. Some services, like Wake County EMS have instituted such a program with great success. Many other systems are also now taking what Wake County has learned, and are adapting it to fit there needs.

The current model is focused on identifying “at risk patients” (chronically ill, special needs, and what is sometimes referred to as frequent flyers ) and using specially trained Paramedics to better serve their individual needs, in a non emergent setting, with a style of care that mixes a home health nurse, social worker and a primary care physician.

Considering the fact that even in the “911 setting” much of what we do is non emergent primary care, and that unnecessary ER visits and hospitalizations significantly contribute to the rise in health care costs. Community Paramedicine is a logical evolution of the industry.

But what if you have a unique population to serve and want to better the prehospital care in your area? Well one such organization has met the challenge.

Hatzolah/Hatzalah (“rescue” or “relief” in Hebrew: הצלה‎) is a volunteer EMS organization serving mostly Jewish communities around the world. Most local branches operate independently of each other, but use the common name. It is also often called Chevra Hatzolah, which loosely translates as “Company of Rescuers.”

The original Hatzolah EMS was founded in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, New York, by Rabbi Hershel Weber in the late 1960s, to improve rapid emergency medical response in the community, and to mitigate cultural concerns of a Yiddish-speaking, religious Hasidic community. The idea spread to other Orthodox Jewish neighborhoods in the New York city area, and eventually to other regions, countries, and continents. Hatzolah, as an organization, is the largest volunteer ambulance service in the world. Chevra Hatzalah in New York has more than a thousand volunteer EMTs and Paramedics who answer more than 250,000 calls each year with private vehicles and a fleet of more than 70 ambulances.

Hatzalah members were among the first responders to the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. Alongside other rescue workers, Hatzalah volunteers risked their lives to rescue, treat, and transport countless victims of the terrorist attack. In the process they earned great respect from their peers in the emergency service community.

Hatzolah organizations now function in Israel, Australia, South Africa, Mexico City, Belgium, Switzerland, several provinces of Canada, Russia the United Kingdom, and at least five states in the US.

In Israel, the largest Hatzalah organization is called Ichud Hatzalah (Hebrew: איחוד הצלה‎), Hebrew for, “United Hatzalah.” Ichud was founded in the aftermath of Israel’s Second Lebanon War in 2006 when its founders decided they would like to improve unified central rescue response. A prior organization, Hatzolah Israel, also exists, and is of comparable size.

Hatzolah uses a fly-car system, where members are assigned to a district to respond from in the event of an emergency. The dispatcher requests any units for a particular emergency location. Members who think they will have best response times respond via handheld radios, and the dispatcher confirms the appropriate members. Two members will typically respond directly to the call in their private vehicles. A third member retrieves an ambulance from a base location.

Each directly-dispatched Hatzolah volunteer has a full medical technician “jump kit,” in their car, with oxygen, trauma, and appropriate pharmaceutical supplies. Paramedic members carry a full array of ALS supplies, including EKG monitors, IV equipment , intubation, and more pharmaceuticals. Each volunteer is called a Unit (as in, a crew of one), and is assigned a unit number that starts with a neighborhood code, followed by a serial number for that neighborhood (e.g., F-100 was Flatbush unit number 100, a”h). Ambulances also have unit numbers in the same format, with the first few numbers for each neighborhood reserved for the ambulance numbers. Some neighborhoods have begun to assign 3-digit unit numbers to their ambulances, using numbers out of the range assigned to human member units (e.g. 900-numbers).

In some areas there may be periods where coverage is not strong enough, for example on a summer weekend. When this happens, coordinators may assign an on-call rotation. The rotation may still respond from their houses, or they may stay at the garage through their shift. In such periods, Hatzoloh functions closer to a typical EMS crew setup, though the dispatchers may still seek non-on-call members to respond, and there will still often be a non-ambulance responder as first dispatched, even if that responder starts from the base.

One area where Hatzalah gets huge kudos from me is in the cultural consideration department. Cultural sensitives are an issue for any EMS that covers immigrant areas, especially when a given immigrant population is relatively small, speaks a unique language, and has a specialized insular culture. Hatzolah was formed in the Hasidic enclave of Williamsburg, in Brooklyn, NY, a community that matches this description. Language, religion, and culture barriers made emergency medical situations more difficult than they might be otherwise, especially as regards laws of the Jewish Sabbath and Holidays, and laws of modestly in clothing, and contact between males and females.

While the primary reason Hatzolah was formed was to speed up medical response, the cultural issues play no small part. Though long established in America and elsewhere, Hasidic communities in Williamsburg and elsewhere, to this date, continue to have the same milieu found when Hatzolah was formed.

A Jew reluctant to violate Sabbath rules when receiving medical attention from an “outsider,” may be more at ease and easily convinced of the medical urgency, when the EMT or Paramedic is a fellow Orthodox Jew, speaking the same patois of Yiddish, English, and Hebrew. A female worried about physical modesty and contact, knows that a Jewish provider is more aware of the details of her concerns, and will reduce the problem as much as possible.

In addition, in areas where EMS charges a fee, there is an additional factor. Lower income clientele that may lack health insurance may have a reluctance to call for an ambulance unless the evidence of urgency is overwhelming even to the layman. This may result in true emergencies not getting treatment until symptoms worsen, to avoid the cost. A volunteer service, with sensitivities to the local community, tends to reduce that reluctance; Hatzolah is well known for its willingness to handle the “check-out” case, where there is frequently no real emergency, without charge and with great patient sensitivity. In this way, the true emergencies among those check-outs may be recognized and treated quickly, where the caller might have otherwise not sought treatment.

We all experience cultural differences, but having a provider of the same heritage is priceless. Your community my not be as unique, but there is a lot to be learned from Hatzalah’s operation. For more information check out their website, and take a look at a true “community” EMS system.

I heard an interview with a Hatzalah EMT, and was interested in the service. I found Wikipedia to have the most content, and much of the information here is from that article. If anyone has any more info, or has experience working with them let me know.

06
May
10

EMS On The Hill

On May 3rd and 4th, I was in Washington D.C for The first annual EMS On The Hill event presented by the National Association of EMT’s and Advocates for EMS. At this event, we as a profession took a huge step towards bringing EMS to the next level. The event started on the evening of the 3rd, with a meeting between the participants and high ranking members of the NAEMT. We were brought up to speed, and given materials on the legislation we would be advocating for, followed by a briefing of what to expect the following afternoon on the hill.

The room was packed with a mix of field providers, educators and chiefs from around the country, and I had a feeling very similar to the one I had at the Chronicles of EMS premier. The feeling of pride and community one gets when in the company of people who share the same passion for ones cause. “When we first came up with this idea, we thought that if we could get 30 or 40 people in one place, that would be something” said Jerry Jonston of the NAEMT. What resulted was 140 professionals, representing 40 states and Puerto Rico, all here for one reason, to make EMS better for ourselves, and the patients and communities we serve.

On a side note, myself and my GenMed colleague Natalie Quebodeaux were the youngest providers there. Our excitement and enthusiasm was both refreshing and motivating to everyone we spoke to. Why were we all here in the first place? We were here to show our shared legislative priorities as EMS Practitioners. First the Medicare Ambulance Access Preservation Act of 2009 (S. 1066, H.R. 2243), which would provide permanent Medicare Reimbursement relief for ambulance services consistent with the 1997 GAO report that determined that ambulance providers are paid significantly below cost. And the Dale Long Emergency Medical Service Providers Protection Act (S. 1353) along with the Nongovernmental Emergency Responder Family Protection Act (H.R. 2485). Both bills would extend the federal Line of Duty Death benefits to EMS professionals employed by private and non-profit EMS agencies.

After the briefing, we were divided in to groups by our representing states, and quickly became acquainted with one another. I was proud to represent my home state of California, and would be doing so with members from the San Francisco Paramedics Association, and Paramedics from Riverside, Tuolumne, and Contra Costa county. The next afternoon was game day, and delegations from 40 states spent the day meeting with their state’s senators and or staff. My group had meetings with staff members of our senators Barbara Boxer and Diane Feinstein. The Meetings went great, and the staff  members were very interested and understanding of our mission. After my meetings, Natalie invited me to sit in on her meetings that were set to begin shortly. She was representing Louisiana, and I met some wonderful people there. Ken Bouvier and Dr. Jullette Saussy Director of New Orleans EMS. Also Tim Morrison.  It was very interesting to see how different the delivery of the information and our message was between the two states.

That evening, there was a small reception, and Natalie and I were fortunate to have a long conversation with KC Jones, the NAEMT Educational Director of Region IV. We talked about the differences in our systems, the new educational standards, and brainstormed ways to create a more unified EMS system in the U.S. It is because of events like this, that I am confident EMS is on the right track toward progressing to the high level profession it deserves to be. Personally I found the whole experience to be very rewarding, and I am already looking forward to next year.

When the political hat was put away, I was able to meet (in person) some great friends and EMS professionals. Scott Kier (@MedicSBK) and his friend Emily drove down from Massachusetts to hang out, explore the capital a bit, and and share in some good times over dinner and breakfast . Also Matt Basset (@squirrel325) and his girl friend (another Emily) was able to come out and show us around the city. Matt was great company, and has a unique background of experience to draw from when it comes to public safety. EMS On The Hill, great people coming together for a great cause. Ya can’t beat that.

To listen to a great podcast about EMS on the hill with special guest Scott Kier ——> click here <—–

02
May
10

Looking For Trouble: Part 1

What do you think one of the most important skills a EMT or Paramedic can have? is it good IV skills? Maybe good airway management? Or how about a friendly bed side manor? theses are all without argument very important skills to have, but what about assessment skills?

It is the first treatment every one of  our patients receive, and one that should be continued until care is transferred. It is the one skill that no matter what the chief complaint, is always preformed… or is it?

Do you really, fully and properly assess and examine every patient? Do you take into consideration every thing the patient and the scene is telling you before making a treatment or transport decision? Unfortunately no, and I’ll the first to admit I’ve cut corners from time to time. The sad truth is we all get lazy, and can fall into bad habits of sorts. But why?

I see over confidence being a major cause of inconsistent assessments. It’s easy to roll up and say “oh it’s just another fill in the blank , their fine, lets ship it.” I have seen it too many times, and having it result in “less then appropriate care.” Perhaps another problem is the way we as individuals approach assessments. In school when it come to assessments we stress the points of being consistent and thorough. Then during field training, the advice changes, and we are told to get our assessments down to a system. And the mantra of  “don’t treat the monitor (any diagnostic equipment) treat the patient” is drilled.  Sound advice, but is it being understood?

Based on my experience of observing others assessment “habits”, I believe there may be a misinterpretation of what is being taught. ” Be consistent and thorough”  could be interpreted as “memorize an algorithm and hit every mark.”  So with that, are you using and understanding the information that your assessment is presenting? Or are you too worried about forgetting to palpate “that”, and ask “this” question?

“Don’t treat the monitor, treat the patient” could be (and I have seen)  practiced as “treat at face value, if they look ok, meh… they are probably ok.”  Now that’s having a great index of suspicion.

I’m going to ask you to shift the way you approach your assessments, and to show up looking for trouble. This is my philosophy, and I think it makes a lot of sense. Let my explain. If you (the patient) or a by stander felt it necessary to dial 911, for whatever reason, this implies that there “is” or “was”  some sort of problem needing attention. If I arrive and find you (the patient) to be in  no apparent distress, I become suspicious.

The way I see it, by the very act of using 911 you have now bought yourself an assessment. And in essence must prove me wrong to your need of my service. Now I don’t mean to be rude about it, but I would rather look for a problem and find nothing, then to just take a BP and call it good.

Beyond the normal set of vitals and an appropriate physical exam, I like to take the time to learn about the patient and the their reason for calling. Its very important to be clear on the circumstances surrounding the summon for EMS. Listen to the patient. Let them describe the event, and how they felt or are feeling in their own words. Listen without filling in the blanks or leading their answers.

Asking about a patients past medical history is something we all do instinctively. But how much are you really pursuing it? When you ask “do you have any medical problems” and they answer “no”, do you follow that with “do you see a doctor for anything?”   Nearly 4 out of 10 Americans has at least one chronic medical condition, and if it is being well managed, and has been for some time, some patients my not consider their chronic illness as a “Problem” because to them its not. Lets suppose they report that they do not see a doctor for any reason. Now do you ask when was the last time they were seen by a doctor? If someone has not seen a doctor in 10-15-20 years, could it be possible that they may have high cholesterol, un managed hypertension, the plague… Yes, and all the more reason to do a full and thorough assessment.

In part 2, I will explain how to do a rather detailed assessment with out using any equipment. But for now, think of how you assess your patients, and if they deserve a little more. After all, you cant treat  something unless you know its there.




Twitter Updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 44 other followers


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 44 other followers